The expanded Child Tax Credit (CTC), which was put in place in 2021, was one of the best measures the US ever made to fight child poverty. Both economists and politicians were surprised by the 40% drop in child poverty that this program was able to achieve.
Low-income families, including those who had been turned away from aid programs before because they didn’t make enough money, were sent monthly payments of up to $300 per child through this policy. With this help, 2.1 million kids were able to stay out of poverty.
The immediate impact of the expanded Child Tax Credit
The expanded CTC worked well, but it wasn’t made a fixed policy. It was not possible for lawmakers to agree on extending it past 2021, so Congress let it expire. But new studies show that this program may have a much bigger good effect in the long run than was first thought.
According to a new study, the increased CTC could have 10 times more benefits than costs. Let’s look more closely at what this means and the arguments about where this strategy should go from here.
The increased Child Tax Credit was a key way to help the poorest families in the country get out of poverty. A lot of low-income families couldn’t get child tax benefits before it was put in place because they didn’t pay enough taxes to get discounts.
This obstacle was taken away by the increased CTC, though, making sure that even families with no income could get the help they needed to pay for their kids’ basic needs.
This program not only greatly decreased kid poverty, but it also helped families become more financially stable. A lot of parents used these funds to pay rent, improve their kids’ eating, or pay for school-related costs. The cost of living keeps going up in this country, so this help was a lifesaver for a lot of families.
Critics of the expanded CTC: is it sustainable long term?
Even though the increased child tax credit had some good short-term effects, it also caused a lot of debate. Some critics said that programs like these could make people less likely to work by giving families cash without any conditions.
Bruce Meyer, an economist at the University of Chicago, was worried that a permanent CTC could undo the welfare reforms of the 1990s. These reforms, Meyer said, increased jobs and lowered the number of children growing up in single-parent homes.
People say this because they think that if parents get money without having to work for it, they might decide to cut back on their hours or quit their jobs altogether.
That being said, this could hurt not only the families involved but also the business as a whole in the long run. Some people also worry that a permanent program could make family bonds weaker, which could lead to more divorces in poor areas.
Many academics and supporters of the expanded CTC, on the other hand, have argued against these worries. Several studies have shown that the larger tax refund did not have a big effect on the number of jobs available.
In fact, parents kept working while getting the CTC, which suggests that the program did not make people less likely to look for work. In addition, there is no strong proof that the program made families less stable.
A 10 to 1 return on investment: what does it mean?
It’s interesting that the claim that the benefits of the increased CTC outweigh its costs by a factor of ten. What does this mean? Ananat and Garfinkel’s research shows that the program has big positive results that last for a long time. Based on their research, investing $1 in the extended CTC could bring $10 in benefits to society.
Some of these benefits are better educational results for children, fewer health problems linked to poverty, and more work in the future for people who participated in the program. Children who grow up in more stable families are more likely to do well in school, get better jobs, and help the economy.
In the long run, this could make society wealthier and lower the costs of poverty, like health care and social aid programs.
Why wasn’t the expanded Child Tax Credit made permanent?
Even though the program worked and there was a lot of proof that it was good for people, the expanded CTC did not become a permanent measure. One of the biggest problems was that politicians couldn’t agree on anything.
Some senators, like Joe Manchin, were worried about how the money would be used. Manchin said that some people who got the money might spend it on things that aren’t necessary, like drugs, which isn’t backed up by study.
The program’s start-up costs were also something that was talked about. Even though the expanded CTC has a high long-term return on investment, it cost a lot of money up front, which made some leaders doubt its viability. But people who support the program keep saying that the social and economic benefits are much greater than the costs.
What does the future hold for the expanded CTC?
The argument over the bigger child tax credit is still going on. Some lawmakers and economists are still not sure if this program will last, but others see it as a unique chance to permanently reduce child poverty. Even though the program is no longer in effect, it is still talked about in Congress, and many people are pushing for it to be brought back.
The expanded CTC’s future will rest a lot on what politicians want to do in the next few years. We might see more programs like this one if lawmakers decide to focus on reducing poverty and helping families who are in danger. At this point, it’s clear that the expanded CTC has benefits that can’t be denied. Families who got it in 2021 have already seen those benefits.
Also See:- If you’re getting disability, SSI, or SSDI shortly: Check your bank account